April 1st, 2010
Life is full of strange coincidences.
We were in Reggio Emilia, Italy for most part of last week, meeting and discussing with their core team, visiting their resource centres and familiarising ourselves with their facilities. One point that they made to us, at length, was that a “Reggio Emilia School” exists only in the city of Reggio Emilia. This is because the system of pre-schooling was contextualised to the historical, cultural and political uniqueness of that particular city. Schools, world over, are inspired by the principles that guide pedagogy in the Reggio Emilia preschools and infant toddler centres and are therefore “Reggio Inspired Schools”. They expressed their extreme displeasure at schools (based outside of Reggio Emilia) that advertised or called themselves “Reggio Emilia schools”.
In this context, we were surprised to see a flyer by one preschool in Gurgaon, calling itself a “Reggio Emilia school”. We were even more surprised that this school had been conferred an award (as per the flyer), by a leading media group, in 2009 for being one of the best pre-schools in India. Based on our visit to Reggio Emilia (my second) and of the school, the leading media group would have done better if they had familiarised themselves with the Reggio Emilia philosophy before conferring this award on the pre-school. While the pre-school may indeed be a good school, misrepresenting themselves as something they are not, should not be condoned or rewarded by any type of award or reward.
Misrepresentation by private schools has become a norm. This trend is extremely unfortunate as educational institutions, are one of the pillars of society we rely on to instil values, ethics and morals in our children. If these very pillars and their guardians are themselves devoid of these qualities, then what type of qualities do we expect our children to imbibe?
Some other instances (that I am aware of) when private schools have opportunistically and deliberately misled and misrepresented for personal gain are:
- There was once a trend, and still is, both within and outside Dehradun, for schools to refer to themselves as “Doon school”. They have even positioned themselves to project a real or perceived connection with the famous The Doon School.
- Some schools name themselves in a manner that is a subtle variation of another famous and reputable school. A point in case is a school somewhere between Dehradun and Delhi that cashes in on the good standing of Woodstock School, Mussoorie. Ubiquitously, this school goes by the name Woodstork.
- Of late, schools have been trying to sell themselves as international/global/world schools; again to mislead the gullible and ill-informed parents into believing that these schools conform to international standards or followed international curriculum. Most of these schools did not even measure up to the national benchmarks, let alone international ones.
- Many schools call themselves “Academy” not realising that to be one, an institution must have specified number of classrooms or more and accommodate a certain number of students at any given time. Some of these “Academy” are housed in residential areas and/or their by lanes.
- Some pre-schools call themselves Grammar Schools even though they are do not specialise in language instruction.
- There are Montessori preschools that keep their Montessori materials locked away in one room with children having only weekly visitation rights based on predetermined agenda regarding usage. Certainly these schools are not Montessori Schools in so much as my house is a Montessori Centre in so much as I also keep Montessori learning aids for my 3 ½ year old son.
The nomenclature or suggestive advertising adopted by some private schools to piggyback on the established repute of some other school, pedagogical concept or affiliation. Rarely is this out of ignorance but usually a deliberate ploy by the owners of these schools to mislead.
I am left wondering; do schools in India need to do this when India produces children at the rate of a class per minute and there is no dearth of students to be taught?
Tags: academies, Education, Educational philosophy, grammar schools, misleading names, montessori schools, Preschool education, Province of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, reggio emilia school, Reggio-Emilia philosophy, school's name, The Doon School, Woodstock School
Posted in Education | No Comments »
May 28th, 2009
This poem by the founder of the Reggio-Emilia approach beautifully conveys the important roles imagination and discovery play in early childhood learning. Much of Reggio-Emilia philosophy is based on protecting children from becoming subjected too early to institutionalized doctrines which often make learning a chore rather than an extension of natural curiosity.
The child is made of one hundred.
The child has
a hundred languages
a hundred hands
a hundred thoughts
a hundred ways of thinking
of playing, of speaking.
A hundred. Always a hundred
ways of listening
of marveling, of loving
a hundred joys
for singing and understanding
a hundred worlds
to discover
a hundred worlds
to invent
a hundred worlds
to dream.
The child has
a hundred languages
(and a hundred hundred hundred more)
but they steal ninety-nine.
The school and the culture
separate the head from the body.
They tell the child:
to think without hands
to do without head
to listen and not to speak
to understand without joy
to love and to marvel
only at Easter and at Christmas.
They tell the child:
to discover the world already there
and of the hundred
they steal ninety-nine.
They tell the child:
that work and play
reality and fantasy
science and imagination
sky and earth
reason and dream
are things
that do not belong together.
And thus they tell the child
that the hundred is not there.
The child says:
No way. The hundred is there.
-Loris Malaguzzi, Founder of the Reggio Emilia Approach
In April of this year, I had the privilege of observing little children express themselves in these hundred languages, with the help of their teachers, the pedagogistas and the atelieristas in Reggio Emilia itself. You may want to visit the Reggio exhibitions when they pass by your city/country to get a peek into the work they do.
Tags: Child, Children, languages, Loris Malaguzzi, Reggio Emilia, Reggio-Emilia approach, Reggio-Emilia philosophy, The Hundred Languages of Children
Posted in Reggio Emilia | 1 Comment »
April 28th, 2009
Education is a right of the child and a responsibility of the community/society. Such a simple statement with profound implications echoed all along my stay in Reggio Emilia. If you consider education as means of fulfilling some needs, that implies that there is a lack of something that education will make complete. But if you consider it as a right, then you see its full potential and strength.
Education is a social activity and schools are public spaces which have nothing to do with ease of physical access to public at large but with social visibility and transparency. Children come from “society” into the school and after school go back into “society”. The schools needs to be a bridge, and not a disconnect between the two “societies” so as to facilitate the process of learning and self-actualisation. Jerome Bruner (Noted Educational Psychologist and author of “The Process of Education”; “Towards a Theory of Instruction” & “The Culture of Education”) put it well when he said, “…..knowing where you are, where you find yourself, helps you to develop your sense of personal identity, your uniqueness, as well as your place in the world.” Schools well rooted in their societal ground, can develop strong learning for all protagonists in the school – children, parents and teachers.
A school is a place of dialogue, a dialogue between children and adults, a dialogue among adults, a dialogue between diversity, a dialogue between verbal and visual, a dialogue between the society and school. Yet so easily is it reduced to a monologue…..from the adults, from the education boards.
Children make learning a social activity, communication and collaboration comes naturally to them. In words of Carla Rinaldi, President of Reggio Children, “Childhood is an interpretation, a cultural construction”. So why is there very little dialogue between the school and the society? Why does society treat the school as a service provider rather than an extension of the society itself? And why does schools curriculum fail to reflect its social/cultural ethos?
Tags: Carla Rinaldi, Children, dialogue, Education, Educational Psychologist and author, Jerome Bruner, learning, Reggio Children, Reggio Emilia, schools, self-actualisation
Posted in Reggio Emilia | No Comments »