Posts Tagged ‘learners’


June 5th, 2009

The What, How and Why of Differentiation in Classroom

1 in every 3 students in the US is a dropout, not because they are dumb but because they are bored and schooling expects them to adapt their learning to a curriculum and not vice versa.

While the curriculum in most cases is a rigid entity, the teachers who are entrusted, legally and professionally, with the communication of that curriculum to the students need not be. Everyday, the teacher should make herself increasingly useless in this equation, empowering the students to be independent learners. The teacher who interacts with the diverse body of learners on an ongoing basis cannot adopt “recipe teaching”. There are resources to help a teacher who wants to bring about differentiation in classroom; but that can only guide her – the final design is her responsibility after considering her class dynamics.

So what does a teacher differentiate in order to optimize all students’ learning? This question needs careful analysis and depending on the students’ needs, a teacher could:

 Differentiate the learning environment and materials with which the learners work; for example, in primary grades teachers may sometimes organise students to work at different stations with different resources; or

 Differentiate the content; for example, in a math class some students may be working on 2-digit multiplication, while other with 3-digit multiplication; or

 Differentiate the activities designed to understand the content or assessment tasks; for example, students are given the option to choose from writing an essay or a political cartoon or a parody to demonstrate their understanding of a common historical event or concept.

Students’ needs may vary in readiness, interest or learning profile and differentiation addresses this need. All teachers must differentiate instruction and assessment based on the needs of the learners, to motivate them and to make learning more efficient and accessible. There can be a million reasons for not differentiating instruction and assessment and none of them would be new. In contrast there is one main reason why teachers must differentiate instruction and assessment – respect for students’ and their learning.

May 15th, 2009

Investigating e-portfolios: The learner’s perspective

 

E-portfolio (EP) learner preferences in an EP system:

Flexibility: EPs are about people, rather than technology. EP tools should be unobtrusive, supportive & flexible to accommodate the diverse learner needs & preferences who can benefit from the ability to integrate their choice of tools into the EP system (i.e. social networking websites for discussion or mobile devices for capturing evidence). The ability to customise is especially important if EPs are used for reflection and personal development. Flexible EPs encourage learners to explore different ways of understanding and recording the learning journey & to gain a better appreciation of their learning preferences.

Learning Goal Matrix: EPs are most effective when used along with a learning goal matrix and introduced to learners at the very beginning. The goals matrix, discussed and negotiated first with the class, establishes ownership of the portfolio building process and encourages learners to reflect on their learning throughout the development journey.  EP based tasks have more credibility for learners if learner progress against the goals matrix is assessed.

Teacher Engagement: Learners become empowered through the reflective cycle associated with EP based learning. However, learners require guidance and direction throughout the learning cycle and a system that promotes dialogue with teachers and provides prompt and personalised feedback is preferred. Teacher engagement enables learners to be more focused on attainment of learning goals by facilitating an understanding of areas for improvement.

Peer learning: Working partnership between learners, teachers and peers is important in the achievement of EP-based learning objectives. Peer-to-peer support in a school establishes a shared understanding of the value of EPs for all participants. Participative discussion within EPs during reflection helps identify difficulties that impact the achievement of learning goals. Reflection provides a record of skills development over time – a progressive track record of which can boost learners’ sense of self worth. 

Supporting e-portfolio learners: Flexible support options are critical to learners’ progress. Learners are more likely to respond positively if EP use is introduced through carefully scaffolded tasks.

May 8th, 2009

Web 2.0 : Dimensions of learner experience

The Web 2.0 is a powerful teaching resource as it encompasses the playful, expressive, reflective and exploratory aspects of knowledge building. Web 2.0 is an umbrella term for internet applications which support internet-based interaction between and within groups (social networking, wikis, folksonomies, virtual societies, blogging, multiplayer online gaming and ‘mash-ups’). These applications are built around the collaborative creation, acquisition and sharing of content amongst a communities of users. The educational benefits of Web 2.0 are derived from the readability / writeability of the web, where users can easily generate their own content as well as consume content produced by others.

When directed at learning, Web 2.0 impacts on four principal dimensions of learner experience. Two are broadly social in nature (collaboration and publication) and two are more cognitive (literacy and inquiry).

Collaboration:  Web 2.0 offers educators a set of tools to support forms of learning that are highly collaborative and more oriented to the building of classroom communities. It allows learners to collaborate and coordinate actions and activities to construct common and shared learning and to source information and expertise from external sources. 

Publication: The read-write character of Web 2.0 supports the creation of original material for publication in various formats (oral, written, audio, video) which would otherwise be difficult and expensive to achieve in a conventional classroom setting. The relatively unbounded space and global viewership offers a strong feeling of doing authentic research and contributes to the authors sense of self worth.

Literacy: Learning in conventional classrooms is primarily in written and spoken forms. Digital media stretches the conventional orientation of literacy by offering new forms of representation and expression. In a recent major review of England’s primary school curriculum, the conventional definition of ‘literacy’ has been stretched to include ‘digital literacy’.

Inquiry: Web 2.0 technologies offer new ways for learners to search and source information. It has created new structures for organising, cataloguing and sourcing data, all of which has the potential to empower students as independent learners. It puts potential seekers of information in direct contact with experts and provides an environment for geographically distributed users to take part in structured exchange for mutual benefit.

Web 2.0 offers learners a more participatory experience of learning in which individuals have increased opportunities to interact with other learners and providers of information. As learners become more and more engaged with digital technologies, gain fluency in their application, and with the job market assigning increased weightage  to candidates with digital competencies, teaching practices and curriculum must address the challenge of developing these attributes.

May 6th, 2009

Education for digital learner in digital world

In our world…

Everyone with a computer can be a potential writer, author or a publisher

Everyone with a cell phone with a camera can be a potential photographer or a journalist

Everyone with a computer and internet access is potentially connected to everyone else

Everyone with a computer, internet access and a message or an idea has a global audience

Everyone with a computer, internet access and a product has a global market

Everyone with a computer and a printer has a printing press

Are our children prepared for a world where…

Physical space is becoming more and more irrelevant

They have access to or the ability to connect to the best brains on the planet

They are potential learners and teachers at the same time

Content is everywhere;

                  available in abundance;

                      in all shapes and sizes; 

                          from all perspectives; and

                              becomes obsolete almost immediately.

Information is constantly shifting; 

                  being updated; or

                      being added to

Learning is not linear

                  is not confined to the curriculum

Are we preparing our children for the future…

                  A future that is changing as we speak.

                      A future that we don’t know what it would look like.

Are we giving our children the tools to compete…?